What Is The Best 'Barrier-to-Entry'?
12 Comments Latest comment by: Balaji M
reddit
|
digg it!
|
del.icio.us
About a year ago, I had the pleasure of attending a speech by Scott Cook, the founder of Intuit and one of the best business minds in Silicon Valley. During his speech, Scott discussed what he called "the best barrier-to-entry" that any company can have - something that results in the most powerful competitive advantage. Can you guess what it is?

eBay Has It. But Not Google!
It is something eBay has but Google doesn't - any guesses yet?!
Scott was talking about "Network Effect". This is a term that was grossly misused by many dotcoms during the boom days of late nineties. What exactly is "Network Effect" then?
Network Effect is the phenomenon whereby a product or service becomes more valuable as more people use it, thus encouraging ever-increasing numbers of users.
According to Metcalfe's law, the total value of a product/service that possesses a network effect is roughly proportional to the square of the number of customers already using that product/service.
How eBay Benefits From Network Effect
eBay's online auction marketplace is a great example of a service that benefits from network effect.
- As more and more buyers use eBay's auction marketplace, the value of the marketplace increases for sellers...
- causing more sellers to join which in turn increases its value for buyers...
- causing even more buyers to join...
- and so on...
When a competitor starts a new online auction marketplace, it is very hard to break the dominance of the incumbent. Reason: In the beginning, there are few buyers in the new marketplace - as a result of which few sellers join which in turn discourages even more buyers.
A proof of this plays out in almost every mature internet market today. Whether it is the US, Japan or Germany - one company has the dominant share of the online auctions marketplace, while all others lag far behind.
In the U.S., even when competitors like Yahoo make their auctions free - they still cannot make much of a dent in eBay's dominance despite the fact that eBay itself is raising prices! Network effect can be that powerful.

How Common Is Network Effect?
Although many of the now defunct dotcoms claimed to create network effects, network effect is not very common. Some products/services naturally lend themselves to network effects, while most do not.
The products/services that have inherent network effects usually fall into one of these categories:
- Marketplaces & Trading Exchanges:
- Physical/virtual gathering places and exchanges that enable buyers and sellers to come together and engage in trade
- Examples: eBay, Paypal, New York Stock Exchange, NASDAQ
- Platforms & Standards:
- Frameworks upon which multiple vendors in a marketplace create products to ensure compatibility and interoperability
- Examples: Microsoft Windows, CDMA, DVD
- Communication Tools:
- Tools that enable one person to communicate with another person who has the same tool
- Examples: AOL Instant Messenger, Skype, Microsoft Word, Adobe PDF
- Social Networking (Community) Applications:
- Tools that enable friends, business partners, or other individuals to connect and/or share information over the Internet
- Examples: LinkedIn, Friendster, Flickr, Del.icio.us
Most of the other products/services do not have network effects. An online portal doesn't create "Network Effect" by acquiring eyeballs - this was one of the popular (and incorrect) claims by dotcoms. I don't gain more value from Yahoo.com just because more and more people use it.
A search engine doesn't have network effect either - again I don't get any more value from using Yahoo Search just because many others also use it. I believe this is one of the major reasons Google was able to so easily take away Yahoo's leadership in online search.
Likewise, I don't believe Google Search itself possesses any network effect today. If a new entrant provides a significantly better search experience than Google - I believe that they can, over time, take the market leadership away from Google.
Can You Build Network Effect For Your Products?
In his interview with HBS in 2001, Scott Cook says:
I also think that a fundamental understanding of network effects is very important. ... Network effects are a fundamental characteristic of certain technology businesses. When network effects are possible, it is the most important thing in the world to follow, to understand, and to make happen. (emphasis added)
While not all products/services lend themselves to network effects, analyze your products and services thoroughly and often to see whether you can build features that result in network effects similar to the products/services in the examples above.
If you're able identify any such possibilities, make it the the most important thing in the world for your Product Management and Product Marketing teams "to follow, to understand and to make happen". You will be glad you did.
When you hit it big by doing this, don't thank me - just send money! :)
Until next time...
Like this article? Then you will love my FREE monthly email newsletter - loaded with useful information for Product Management & Product Marketing professionals. It is FREE - get it now!
About the Author: I'm your author, Michael Shrivathsan, an expert in product management and product marketing with successful experience spanning two decades. I live in Silicon Valley, USA. For my day job, I manage the product management group at an exciting software startup.
Comments
I must disagree on one point. Yahoo.com has a lot of network effects too. For example, they have the most comprehensive content. As a result, more users use the content and provide feedback on what they like, and Yahoo is better able to create more useful content such as their "Most Popular" pages. This is network effect too.
Posted by: Vikram Singh | March 18, 2006 12:55 AM
This is one of the best posts I have read on the role of Network-Effect in high tech markets. What a great job!
Posted by: Raj Pandi | March 18, 2006 01:48 AM
Great post -- and a much more detailed treatment than I gave it on my blog.
I'm comforted to know that someone agres with me (i.e. Google search doesn't really have a network effect).
Posted by: Dharmesh Shah | March 18, 2006 09:27 AM
Michael, Nice to see I inspired you to write on this topic!
I think there is a new group of internet companies that also lay claim to network effects, the "Web 2.0" companies. Based on your definition, many of these companies actually don't have any.
I agree with you and Dharmesh that Google Search itself doesn't have network effects. There may be some network effects in their AdSense program though. More advertisers join AdSense because there are a lot of content sites that use it, and more content sites use AdSense since there are more advertisers.
I'm trying to think of companies with network effects that don't fall under one of your categories. I'll post them once I find some.
Posted by: Josh Thomson | March 18, 2006 04:20 PM
I'm just curious. Which companies do you think are going to beat Google in search?
Posted by: anon | March 18, 2006 04:36 PM
How about the following? Which category do they fit in?
* Microsoft Windows: More people buy it because there are a lot of applications for it, and more vendors create apps because of more customers
* DVD: More people buy DVD player because there are a lot of movies on DVD, and more movies are released in DVD because of more consumers with DVD players
{Author's Note: This article has been updated since this comment to cover these products too.}
Posted by: Josh Thomson | March 19, 2006 04:01 PM
Raj, Dharmesh: Thanks for the compliments.
I've linked Dharmesh's excellent article on network effects here as well so that other readers can find it easily.
Anon: I'm not saying an existing company *will* beat Google Search - I'm just saying some company *can* if they provide a much superior search experience, as Google Search doesn't have powerful network effects that create impossible-to-cross barriers.
Posted by: Michael | March 19, 2006 10:29 PM
Josh,
Thanks for the excellent question regarding MS Windows, DVDs, etc. I'll update the article shortly to cover this.
Posted by: Michael | March 19, 2006 10:33 PM
Ahhh, the beauty of the Internet! Give feedback and watch blog article updated within a few hours in response to the feedback! :-)
Posted by: Josh Thomson | March 20, 2006 11:29 PM
This is an interesting read. As you say some products don't have any inherent network effects. In these cases it may be hard to create one that also proves useful to customers, not just a contrived one. But it seems Intuit itself has created network effects in products that don't have any inherent network effects.
Posted by: Yuen Li | March 26, 2006 04:21 PM
thats some gud stuff u've got up there... i found this article very useful for my coursework.. cheers mate!
Posted by: MN Ahmed | April 24, 2006 07:05 AM
A very nicely written post. But i would differ with you on one point.
Likewise, I don't believe Google Search itself possesses any network effect today. If a new entrant provides a significantly better search experience than Google - I believe that they can, over time, take the market leadership away from Google.
I think this is much more sublime topic than that. I may be wrong here. So pls do forgive me.
In my mind, search is synonymous with Google and it will be very difficult for me to change the search engine even if a better search comes up. How better can it be????
Posted by: Balaji M | July 26, 2006 07:57 AM